[Urbanstudy] second posting : Ramya
sadan at sarai.net
sadan at sarai.net
Wed May 24 13:28:24 CEST 2006
Dear all,
Sending a posting by Ramya Swayamprakash. She has been working on mill
lands of Mumbai. send comments/remarks to <ramya.swayamprakash at gmail.com>
wishes,
sadan.
Ramya writes,
As a part of my research for the Sarai Fellowship, I saw Ramu
Ramanathan's Cotton 56, Polyester 84, translated into Hindi by Chetan
Dattar.
The play uses the medium of drama to bring to the fore the highly
politicized problem of the sprawling mill lands of Mumbai and the impact
of their 'development' on the workers and the city itself. Bhau and Kaka
are the marginalized mill workers as well as the commentators of this
socio-cultural debate. Although one sees more actors from Bhau's life
(his wife, son, his son's girlfriend) being an active part of the play,
it is quite difficult to discern who among Bhau and Kaka as a narrator.
The stories of Bhau and Kaka are inextricably intertwined.
A cleverly and effectively designed background mural forms the basis of
the play. The three dimensional background depicts the drowning out of
the spaces that once housed these mills under the looming and fast
advancing skyline of the city. The foreground of the play expatiates
this transitory background with its constant flurry of characters.
Throughout the play the circular seating space that marks the communal
reading area is also the meeting place of the actors and a place where
actors stock their minimal belongings. It is in this area that a
majority of the action of the play takes place.
As the play progresses the lives of Bhau and Kaka go through a myriad of
struggles; the play is like a nostalgic documentary that leaves the
spectator back in the present without making any predictions, offering
solutions. Shifting between the present and the past the play also talks
about parallel effects like the rise of the mafia as the mills declined.
Bhau's son becomes a part of the mafia as Bhau's is no longer earning.
The shrewd business man who whilst playing to the stereotype (!?) of
being a Gujrati and an opportunist, tries giving Bhau and Kaka jobs in
other fields but they decline. He is shown as their nemesis who after
the collapse of the mills set up a profitable establishment of power
looms in Bhiwandi and offers jobs to Bhau and Kaka in them.
The play and my project:
As I sat there waiting for the play to beginning one just heard the
familiar street sounds playing, buses, cars, taxis, street vendors.
Having been to Girangaon and just walked around the place, the chimneys
of the set, the sounds etc were eerily familiar. I say eerily because
somewhere in my head it was a combination of what I had seen and what I
have read in Darryl D'Monte's Ripping the Fabric: the Decline of Mumbai
and its Mills and Neera Adarkar and Meera Menon's One Hundred Years One
Hundred Voices- I did not know where one ended and the other began. And
then the play began with Bhau and Kaka identifying the fabric of people
passing by. it took me a little time before I realized that they were in
fact talking about the yarn on the people's clothes. For a second, they
reminded me of Waiting for Godot but as the play progessed, their
existential crises seemed to give way to the simple( I use this word
loosely) human will to fight and hope.
Somewhere in the middle, Kaka is used brilliantly to show the unending
battle the workers face to get their compensation and whilst narrating
his endless courtroom battles, he talks of the other jobs he has had to
take as the mills collapsed-from being a rickshaw driver to trying to
start his own business. And through the entire narration his eyes never
twinkle once and just the mention of the 'spindle' and the passion is
palpable.
Most remarkably this play brought to my eyes, the things I had only read
and imagined. As the play progressed the characters of Bhau and Kaka
were caught in a time warp who were unable to grapple with these fast
changes to the city and their conflicting realities made it even more
difficult for them to adjust to the moral relativity that this
'urbanization' necessitated. The play brought to life all that I read
and heard about the mill culture, for instance Bhau and Kaka's drinking
habits, which were portrayed as being a part and parcel of the package-
a reality echoed by the books and articles I have read. As it moved
deeper into the characters, the subtler realities of the mills come out.
Bhau's son's life ambition is to succeed his father in the mills- an
ambition that he realizes soon enough. Nothing brings him more joy that
to accompany his father to the mills wearing his white topee. But
unfortunately the mills closed down and like his father he became
unemployed and with no source of income and with the easy option of the
underworld beckoning he chooses the latter. His career in the underworld
although lands him a lot of money, it puts him at odds with his father's
ideology. He falls in love with his Bhai's younger sister and the two
lovers try and find a level ground where their economic disparities
don't matter as much.
Bhau's wife is one of the strongest characters in the play who in times
of need starts her own kitchen to support the family. She is also one of
the most vociferous members of the mahila mandals.
The play is able to bring out hues of a Bombay forgotten (as cheesy as
it sounds); to me the play brings out the transition of a city where it
was possible to succeed without having to step over someone else. On
some levels it speaks of the importance of community living where
immiserization was a part of class consciousness and which was fought
not only through struggles but through dreams. Class consciousness in
the Marxian sense was very much present and it was reinforced through
strikes (strikes in the early part of the 20th century were massive,
like the strike in 1928)
Throughout the play, there is a lot of song and dance specifically a
marked leaning toward Marathi song and dance (although most was
translated into Hindi). This song and dance indicated not only the
importance of traditional entertainment forms but also the dominance of
the Marathi culture in the area. Walking through the area it slowly
seeps in even now (although the magnitude is far lesser).
Another aspect of Bombay that the play brings out is the communal and
caste divisions which were strong. As equals as they were in being
workers, low caste workers could not access high caste wells and the
high castes would not use the water of the low caste. Muslims were
looked at with suspicion.
To me, the play also marked the transition between a city which treated
its citizens as stakeholders and the global city which treats its
citizens as spectators. Through the constant reinforcement of the vision
of 'world class city' and the replacement of an organic and encompassing
growth by a 'global citizens'. This global has also meant
depoliticiziation and degradation of political space into something that
is meant only for the dirty politicians. De-politicization of the public
space has meant the famous chalta hai attitude of Bombay, a slow
emaciation of the citizen into someone who can only lament but does not
believe that he/she can do much. Participation into the working of
democracy is avoidable while the pursuit of money to be powerful is more
acceptable.
The city now loves being global and the only thing that the young adults
of this city know about the city's mills is that sometime in the distant
past. I spoke to a teenager who did not know anything about the mills
and who seemed to think that the chimneys in the mill compounds were
made by these developers! Redevelopment although inevitable is seen as
the passport to the global equality that 'Mumbai' (read the bourgeoisie
who constitute a minisculic part of the city) aspires to achieve. Bombay
must fast become 'global' and destroy its history in order to
accommodate the present and the future.
--
~Ramya~
Text and voice 91-9869513903
Blog: http://quixoticgnat.blogspot.com
---------------------------------
Life...is like a grapefruit. It's orange and squishy, and has a few pips
in it, and some folks have half a one for breakfast.
Douglas Adams
---------------------------------
More information about the Urbanstudygroup
mailing list